Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 Running the Realms
 Archdruid PrC

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]
Rolling Eyes [8|] Confused [?!:] Help [?:] King [3|:]
Laughing [:OD] What [W] Oooohh [:H] Down [:E]

  Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Wood Elf Ranger Posted - 21 Aug 2004 : 04:42:42
Does anyone know if an Archdruid PrC has been detailed anywhere? I'm thinking something similar to the Archwizard PrC but with druidic powers for the spellcasting druid. If not I may take a look at creating one myself
14   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Lysander Posted - 23 Aug 2004 : 15:35:25
quote:
Originally posted by SiriusBlack

quote:
Originally posted by Brother Ezra
My reaction to it was more of the lack of inspiring ideas that made me say "I've got to add this to my campaign somehow." Quintessential Cleric had a lot of those types of items for me, and I bought QD on the strength of QC. I just wasn't inspired at all, and our player running a druid wasn't either.



I understand, both Quintessential Drow & Ranger produced the same type of reactions for this buyer.

Thanks for replying.


After getting the Fighter and Elf books I stopped - and was stunned to read in the author's comments that he was overly sick of elves, and hated the decision that was made to saddle him (the author) with the burden of writing the Quintessential Elf. Sure, you do what you're assigned, but what does that say about a company when it assignes a a project to someone that they probably knew wouldn't like the subject material? (I can't see him NOT saying anything, even if "I'll do it, but you know, I hate elves.")
SiriusBlack Posted - 23 Aug 2004 : 05:40:34
quote:
Originally posted by Brother Ezra
My reaction to it was more of the lack of inspiring ideas that made me say "I've got to add this to my campaign somehow." Quintessential Cleric had a lot of those types of items for me, and I bought QD on the strength of QC. I just wasn't inspired at all, and our player running a druid wasn't either.



I understand, both Quintessential Drow & Ranger produced the same type of reactions for this buyer.

Thanks for replying.
Brother Ezra Posted - 23 Aug 2004 : 05:19:24
quote:
Originally posted by SiriusBlack

quote:
Originally posted by Brother Ezra
Unfortunately, the "Quintessential Druid" falls in the 'useless' catagory IMO.



What did you find wrong with it? Is the Archdruid Prestige Class just as useless?


Well, I run a low-level campaign right now, so prestige classes haven't even entered the radar yet. So, I really can't tell you if the archdruid writeup in QD is any good. My reaction to it was more of the lack of inspiring ideas that made me say "I've got to add this to my campaign somehow." Quintessential Cleric had a lot of those types of items for me, and I bought QD on the strength of QC. I just wasn't inspired at all, and our player running a druid wasn't either.
Kuje Posted - 22 Aug 2004 : 18:02:51
quote:
Originally posted by Wood Elf Ranger

Is there a way to tell which books by Mongoose are for what edition? For example in the first set of books they have reference to "Wilderness Lore" a skill which I believe was taken out in 3.x so those are earlier editions but what about the second set are they for 3.x?



If there isn't any text on the cover, near the bottom center, that says compatible with 3.5 then it's 3.0. :)
SiriusBlack Posted - 22 Aug 2004 : 16:32:50
quote:
Originally posted by Brother Ezra
Unfortunately, the "Quintessential Druid" falls in the 'useless' catagory IMO.



What did you find wrong with it? Is the Archdruid Prestige Class just as useless?
Brother Ezra Posted - 22 Aug 2004 : 15:57:53
I believe that the first release of the "Quintessential X" series of books was entirely geared to 3.0. Their latest releases in this series, the "Quintessential X II" is advertised as 3.5 compatible.

I own two of the original series, and haven't found too many problems in updating them to 3.5. However, beware that there is a large variety of quality in this series. Some books are great, and are a trove of good ideas. Others I haven't touched since the day I bought them, and find them useless.

Unfortunately, the "Quintessential Druid" falls in the 'useless' catagory IMO.
Wood Elf Ranger Posted - 22 Aug 2004 : 15:38:31
Is there a way to tell which books by Mongoose are for what edition? For example in the first set of books they have reference to "Wilderness Lore" a skill which I believe was taken out in 3.x so those are earlier editions but what about the second set are they for 3.x?
SiriusBlack Posted - 22 Aug 2004 : 05:40:38
quote:
Originally posted by Wood Elf Ranger

Ooh very nice thanks Sirius



You're welcome. I've no idea on the quality of the Prc or the tome. However, if you do some searching online, I'm sure you'll be able to find a review or two.
Wood Elf Ranger Posted - 22 Aug 2004 : 05:39:14
Ooh very nice thanks Sirius
The Sage Posted - 22 Aug 2004 : 02:56:40
That's the one. I knew that if anyone was going to catch that, it would be good 'ol Sirius...
SiriusBlack Posted - 21 Aug 2004 : 19:46:20
quote:
Originally posted by Wood Elf Ranger

Does anyone know if an Archdruid PrC has been detailed anywhere?


Yep, Mongoose has put out a publication with that Prestige Class.
Wood Elf Ranger Posted - 21 Aug 2004 : 19:26:56
I had though the Hierophant was more for clerics but I see druids can be them too and that does look like what I was wanting though their spells/day does not keep increasing those are some nifty powers so I think that would work well.
Bookwyrm Posted - 21 Aug 2004 : 07:48:03
Um . . . what about the Hierophant?
The Sage Posted - 21 Aug 2004 : 04:50:12
Let me get back to you on this.

I know I've seen one somewhere (the other day in fact)... I just have to look through my tomes.

Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2025 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000