Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 Your ideal year to start a campaign as DM/player?
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Ozreth
Learned Scribe

227 Posts

Posted - 19 Sep 2025 :  14:51:38  Show Profile Send Ozreth a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
Whether you're about to start running or playing a new campaign, when would you like to set it and why in regards to events you want to have already happened to play off of, or events that you still want to unfold, or that you'd like to avoid altogether?

Delnyn
Master of Realmslore

USA
1074 Posts

Posted - 19 Sep 2025 :  15:42:23  Show Profile Send Delnyn a Private Message  Reply with Quote
We can most likely include ideal year in the discussion for "Most Practical Period" thread you recently started.
Go to Top of Page

Zeromaru X
Great Reader

Colombia
2528 Posts

Posted - 20 Sep 2025 :  21:09:05  Show Profile Send Zeromaru X a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I think it's ok to have this topic a separate one from the other. The other seems to be about his own campaign. while this questions seems to be more general.

Anyways, my answer is: depends on the books you have. Not all people have access to all books or the time to study the wiki for info, so the books you already own are the ideal place to start your campaign. I have all the 4e books, for instance, so that's where most my campaigns happen, regardless of edition rules used (though, I play mostly 4e or 5e)

Instead of seeking change, you prefer a void, merciless abyss of a world...
Go to Top of Page

Delnyn
Master of Realmslore

USA
1074 Posts

Posted - 20 Sep 2025 :  22:54:56  Show Profile Send Delnyn a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I'm good with Zero's response. My preference is for the 1370's.
Go to Top of Page

Dalor Darden
Great Reader

USA
4252 Posts

Posted - 21 Sep 2025 :  19:01:32  Show Profile Send Dalor Darden a Private Message  Reply with Quote
My campaign starts at:

1356 D.R. (Forgotten Realms) D.R. = Dale Reckoning

576 C.Y. (Greyhawk) C.Y. = Common Year

1548 V.R. (Aerk) V.R. = Vhal Reckoning

581 (Al-Qadim)

1511 H.C. (Birthright) H.C. = Haelyn Count

320 I.D. (Chaeldain Isles) I.D. = Imperial Date

370 A.C. (Dragonlance) A.C. = After Cataclysm

I do this because of the fact all of those "worlds" are in one world now for my Grey Realms home setting.

The Old Grey Box and AD&D for me!

Edited by - Dalor Darden on 21 Sep 2025 19:15:16
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36955 Posts

Posted - 21 Sep 2025 :  20:38:27  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
If I was to DM, my campaign would start around 1372ish. Everything up to that point would be canon. Everything after that point would be negotiable.

I take that stance because whilst I liked some stuff in 3E, I didn't like all of it, and I thought some things could have been handled better. And there is very little I'd be willing to adopt from after the 3E era.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Trumm
Acolyte

18 Posts

Posted - 23 Sep 2025 :  15:53:22  Show Profile Send Trumm a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Somewhere between 1369 and 1372 D.R.
Go to Top of Page

Scots Dragon
Learned Scribe

United Kingdom
114 Posts

Posted - 23 Sep 2025 :  23:41:36  Show Profile Send Scots Dragon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
It depends on elements of the campaign which would be made use of, but somewhere in the 1350s to 1370s.

Tried using the 1490s once but ultimately I burned out on waiting for Wizards of the Coast to do anything good with the modern Forgotten Realms and their recent full-throated embrace of AI for creating material means that I'm probably not even gonna bother with the upcoming boxed set.

Edited by - Scots Dragon on 23 Sep 2025 23:43:26
Go to Top of Page

Azar
Master of Realmslore

1463 Posts

Posted - 24 Sep 2025 :  01:51:03  Show Profile Send Azar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Scots Dragon

...their recent full-throated embrace of AI for creating material means that I'm probably not even gonna bother with the upcoming boxed set.


I already have zero interest in a new Forgotten Realms. There is enough TSR material to inspire the genesis of endless adventures; furthermore, modern D&D's increasingly kumbaya/sanitized nature is repugnant. However, I am curious as to where their stance on pattern-producing software was shared. If this is true, I consider it the nightshade berry atop a cyanide cake.

Stand with anybody that stands right. Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong.

Earth names in the Realms are more common than you may think.
Go to Top of Page

Scots Dragon
Learned Scribe

United Kingdom
114 Posts

Posted - 24 Sep 2025 :  10:56:32  Show Profile Send Scots Dragon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Azar

quote:
Originally posted by Scots Dragon

...their recent full-throated embrace of AI for creating material means that I'm probably not even gonna bother with the upcoming boxed set.


I already have zero interest in a new Forgotten Realms. There is enough TSR material to inspire the genesis of endless adventures; furthermore, modern D&D's increasingly kumbaya/sanitized nature is repugnant. However, I am curious as to where their stance on pattern-producing software was shared. If this is true, I consider it the nightshade berry atop a cyanide cake.



It was in a recent shareholder conference thing.

I do think you're throwing some of the baby out with the bathwater there. While the third edition era has its flaws, it does feel like an attempt to remain true to the spirit of the TSR-era material, at least early on.
Go to Top of Page

Azar
Master of Realmslore

1463 Posts

Posted - 24 Sep 2025 :  11:26:17  Show Profile Send Azar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Scots Dragon

quote:
Originally posted by Azar

quote:
Originally posted by Scots Dragon

...their recent full-throated embrace of AI for creating material means that I'm probably not even gonna bother with the upcoming boxed set.


I already have zero interest in a new Forgotten Realms. There is enough TSR material to inspire the genesis of endless adventures; furthermore, modern D&D's increasingly kumbaya/sanitized nature is repugnant. However, I am curious as to where their stance on pattern-producing software was shared. If this is true, I consider it the nightshade berry atop a cyanide cake.



It was in a recent shareholder conference thing.

I do think you're throwing some of the baby out with the bathwater there. While the third edition era has its flaws, it does feel like an attempt to remain true to the spirit of the TSR-era material, at least early on.



By "modern", I meant "5e" (i.e., 2014 onwards).

Stand with anybody that stands right. Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong.

Earth names in the Realms are more common than you may think.
Go to Top of Page

sleyvas
Skilled Spell Strategist

USA
12187 Posts

Posted - 24 Sep 2025 :  12:42:24  Show Profile Send sleyvas a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Scots Dragon

quote:
Originally posted by Azar

quote:
Originally posted by Scots Dragon

...their recent full-throated embrace of AI for creating material means that I'm probably not even gonna bother with the upcoming boxed set.


I already have zero interest in a new Forgotten Realms. There is enough TSR material to inspire the genesis of endless adventures; furthermore, modern D&D's increasingly kumbaya/sanitized nature is repugnant. However, I am curious as to where their stance on pattern-producing software was shared. If this is true, I consider it the nightshade berry atop a cyanide cake.



It was in a recent shareholder conference thing.

I do think you're throwing some of the baby out with the bathwater there. While the third edition era has its flaws, it does feel like an attempt to remain true to the spirit of the TSR-era material, at least early on.



Wait, they what??? They actually said in a shareholder meeting that they were using AI to create material?

Alavairthae, may your skill prevail

Phillip aka Sleyvas
Go to Top of Page

Azar
Master of Realmslore

1463 Posts

Posted - 24 Sep 2025 :  14:42:57  Show Profile Send Azar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
There are suspicions that pattern-producing software has been employed (to some degree) in the creation of artwork for their latest edition of D&D.

Stand with anybody that stands right. Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong.

Earth names in the Realms are more common than you may think.
Go to Top of Page

Scots Dragon
Learned Scribe

United Kingdom
114 Posts

Posted - 24 Sep 2025 :  21:14:23  Show Profile Send Scots Dragon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by sleyvas
Wait, they what??? They actually said in a shareholder meeting that they were using AI to create material?



There's some articles on the subject:

https://travisclark.substack.com/p/hasbro-ai-studio-digital-toy-experiences-video-games-transformers-dungeons-and-dragons-monopoly

https://futurism.com/hasbro-ceo-ai-dungeons-dragons
Go to Top of Page

Azar
Master of Realmslore

1463 Posts

Posted - 24 Sep 2025 :  23:38:43  Show Profile Send Azar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I feel sorry for anyone who pays for this sophisticated laziness. I know of at least one tabletop gaming community that was assaulted by "bots" sent to gather information; said information was no doubt gathered to be later filtered and subsequently "arranged" for future fantasy products.

Stand with anybody that stands right. Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong.

Earth names in the Realms are more common than you may think.
Go to Top of Page

Scots Dragon
Learned Scribe

United Kingdom
114 Posts

Posted - 26 Sep 2025 :  01:31:34  Show Profile Send Scots Dragon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Azar
By "modern", I meant "5e" (i.e., 2014 onwards).


That’s one entire fourth edition farther forward than I’ll ever bother going. I only even bothered with fifth edition early on in the hopes it would be a return to form and then it wasn’t so…

Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2025 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000