| Author |
 Topic  |
|
George Krashos
Master of Realmslore
Australia
6688 Posts |
 Posted - 01 Oct 2018 : 01:40:21
|
quote:
Originally posted by George Krashos
Dragon magazine articles aren't 'canon' or official either with respect to FR.
-- George Krashos
I have no idea - to this day - why I posted this back in the day. I was most certainly wrong. The magazines are indeed "canon".
-- George Krashos |
"Because only we, contrary to the barbarians, never count the enemy in battle." -- Aeschylus |
 |
|
|
cpthero2
Great Reader
USA
2287 Posts |
Posted - 01 Oct 2018 : 01:50:32
|
Master Rupert,
Great. Thank you for that information!
Best regards,
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert
quote:
Originally posted by cpthero2
Master Rupert,
I'm curious, with the massive amount of experience you have overall, what ultimately led to them being canon, no longer being canon, etc.? It seems very chaotic. Was it just the issue of ease of access?
That really interests me a lot as well.
They were canon because TSR/WotC published them and said they were canon.
Dragon+ is a newer thing, though, and I don't know if it's been ruled canon or not. I assume that it is, but since I can't download articles as Word files or pdfs, I'm not bothering to read them.
|
Higher Atlar
Spirit Soaring |
|
|
|
cpthero2
Great Reader
USA
2287 Posts |
Posted - 01 Oct 2018 : 01:51:51
|
Master Krashos,
Eh, who knows. I replied to something of Master Rupert's, and it was a disaster. The shat happens on occasion. I'd say your epic contributions have more than made up for something so small. 
Best regards,
quote:
Originally posted by George Krashos
quote:
Originally posted by George Krashos
Dragon magazine articles aren't 'canon' or official either with respect to FR.
-- George Krashos
I have no idea - to this day - why I posted this back in the day. I was most certainly wrong. The magazines are indeed "canon".
-- George Krashos
|
Higher Atlar
Spirit Soaring |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
Questions regarding Amn and Tethyr
