Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 Seeking some clarification on Kaanyr Vhok

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]
Rolling Eyes [8|] Confused [?!:] Help [?:] King [3|:]
Laughing [:OD] What [W] Oooohh [:H] Down [:E]

  Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Aes Tryl Posted - 05 Aug 2006 : 14:29:20
Hello, sorry to bother the sages of candlekeep, but there is a slight contradiction i wish to resolve. Kaanyr Vhok is listed as a fighter 16/sorceror 6 in Power of Faerun but in the other sourcebooks, the only one which i can remember of the top of my head being the Underdark, he's listed as a fighter 7/rogue 2/wizard 6. Which is the correct or more up to date version?
17   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Reefy Posted - 08 Aug 2006 : 01:17:14
quote:
Originally posted by warlockco

Yeah had a fool, take his spellbook out in the heart of a volcano...



Chalk another one up for 'stupidest things a character has done...'
warlockco Posted - 07 Aug 2006 : 22:33:54
quote:
Originally posted by GothicDan

quote:
Plus Wizards need to have their spellbook out to cast on the fly, thus risking it being damaged/destroyed, and cannot use Metamagic.


I always liked that rule. :)



Yeah had a fool, take his spellbook out in the heart of a volcano...
GothicDan Posted - 07 Aug 2006 : 20:56:01
quote:
Plus Wizards need to have their spellbook out to cast on the fly, thus risking it being damaged/destroyed, and cannot use Metamagic.


I always liked that rule. :)
Brenigin Posted - 07 Aug 2006 : 20:19:44
quote:
Originally posted by warlockco
Wizards and Clerics and other prepared casters, are subject to my arbitrary wimps...



That's the best typo all week. Run! 'Tis a flock of arbitrary wimps!
warlockco Posted - 06 Aug 2006 : 21:15:27
quote:
Originally posted by GothicDan

quote:
Yeah, from what I've seen, I agree with that. I personally love the class, but I think they slapped it on certain characters to simply ground it in the Realms more.


Agreed. The Wizards in FR always seem more like a hybrid of the Sorcerer and Wizard classes in 3E anyway, half the time.



Which is why I allow casting on the fly for almost any caster class. Sorcerer's just have unlimited casting since what they have listed is what they have total.
Wizards and Clerics and other prepared casters, are subject to my arbitrary wimps, unless said spell was actually prepared. Plus Wizards need to have their spellbook out to cast on the fly, thus risking it being damaged/destroyed, and cannot use Metamagic.
GothicDan Posted - 06 Aug 2006 : 03:48:20
quote:
Yeah, from what I've seen, I agree with that. I personally love the class, but I think they slapped it on certain characters to simply ground it in the Realms more.


Agreed. The Wizards in FR always seem more like a hybrid of the Sorcerer and Wizard classes in 3E anyway, half the time.
The Sage Posted - 06 Aug 2006 : 03:35:54
quote:
Originally posted by GothicDan

quote:
Before someone comments, yes I know there was a sorcerer kit in Zakhara material but that's not the same as a core base class. :)


Haha, I wonder if anyone else would have actually commented on that, Kuje. ;) Well, Old Sage, maybe...

Probably. ::smirk::


Wooly Rupert Posted - 06 Aug 2006 : 03:30:06
quote:
Originally posted by Faraer

I'm pretty sure some, but not all, of the stattings as sorcerer were done arbitrarily to bolster the presence of the new class in the Realms, so I don't trust the designation.



Yeah, from what I've seen, I agree with that. I personally love the class, but I think they slapped it on certain characters to simply ground it in the Realms more.
Faraer Posted - 05 Aug 2006 : 23:50:51
I'm pretty sure some, but not all, of the stattings as sorcerer were done arbitrarily to bolster the presence of the new class in the Realms, so I don't trust the designation.
Kuje Posted - 05 Aug 2006 : 23:44:23
quote:
Originally posted by Asgetrion

quote:
Originally posted by Kuje

Plus,

there was no sorcerer core class in 2e, so they had to use wizard for his arcane magic levels. Before someone comments, yes I know there was a sorcerer kit in Zakhara material but that's not the same as a core base class. :)



Kuje, I think he refers to the 3e Underdark



You're right. Sigh. I really need to stop replying when I'm half awake. :) I do this all the time, when that's the case.
Asgetrion Posted - 05 Aug 2006 : 23:37:39
quote:
Originally posted by Kuje

Plus,

there was no sorcerer core class in 2e, so they had to use wizard for his arcane magic levels. Before someone comments, yes I know there was a sorcerer kit in Zakhara material but that's not the same as a core base class. :)



Kuje, I think he refers to the 3e Underdark
GothicDan Posted - 05 Aug 2006 : 22:14:06
quote:
Before someone comments, yes I know there was a sorcerer kit in Zakhara material but that's not the same as a core base class. :)


Haha, I wonder if anyone else would have actually commented on that, Kuje. ;) Well, Old Sage, maybe...
Kuje Posted - 05 Aug 2006 : 16:54:02
Plus,

there was no sorcerer core class in 2e, so they had to use wizard for his arcane magic levels. Before someone comments, yes I know there was a sorcerer kit in Zakhara material but that's not the same as a core base class. :)
Aes Tryl Posted - 05 Aug 2006 : 15:54:30
Haha, yep guess thats that. I'll remember to put it to my DM in a euphemistic fashion and then we can go onto Sarya. . . oops i almost forgot she was conveniently destroyed too. Hmm but i thought those rogue lvls did fit him and his role as a devious, scheming half-fiend and it gave him some pretty nifty tricks too, evasion and what not. ah well its the NEW STATS DAMMIT( slaps himself to remember) and many thanks, i dont really have the hang of the jargon yet
Trace_Coburn Posted - 05 Aug 2006 : 15:42:44
quote:
Originally posted by Aes Tryl

retcon sorry? And its kinda weird cos his wizard lvls are now sorceror. . . and he's totally lost his rogue lvls. Hmm but yeah since its a newer book, i'll have to deal with that. Darn my DM was gonna pit us against the Scourged Legion, well looks like we can forget about that. . . lvl 15 is kinda far from lvl 22. Stupid War of The Spider Queen. . .

Retcon = retroactive continuity - a correction that says "this is how it is and how it always was - there was never a different version out there. I don't care if you're staring right at the entry in the old sourcebook that gives those stats: they never existed - these new ones are the ones you use, dammit!"

And personally, I think sorcerer levels are a little more fitting for a tiefling like Vhok, but YMMV. [shrug]
Aes Tryl Posted - 05 Aug 2006 : 15:13:58
retcon sorry? And its kinda weird cos his wizard lvls are now sorceror. . . and he's totally lost his rogue lvls. Hmm but yeah since its a newer book, i'll have to deal with that. Darn my DM was gonna pit us against the Scourged Legion, well looks like we can forget about that. . . lvl 15 is kinda far from lvl 22. Stupid War of The Spider Queen. . .
warlockco Posted - 05 Aug 2006 : 14:53:06
Power of Faerun, being a newer book, retcons all other information regarding his class/levels.

Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2025 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000