Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 About the "foreign lands" of FR
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

RodOdom
Senior Scribe

USA
509 Posts

Posted - 26 Dec 2006 :  17:01:18  Show Profile  Visit RodOdom's Homepage Send RodOdom a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
On Ed's thread The Hooded One wrote:

quote:

Ed had a "western" continent, but not Maztica.
Ed's Moonshae Isles were a cluster of many small Hebrides-style islands.
Ed had a glacier where Vaasa and Damara and the Bloodstone Pass are.
Ed had steppes, but not the Hordelands.
Ed had no Shou Lung (overt Oriental area).
Ed had mysterious southern lands, but not Zakhara.



I personally would like to see Wizards "retcon" Matzica, Zakhara and Shou Lung, and replace them with what Ed had originally intended for the realms. It really wouldn't affect too many of the previous novels involing these regions (all of which are out of print.) What do you guys think?

Kuje
Great Reader

USA
7915 Posts

Posted - 26 Dec 2006 :  17:09:24  Show Profile Send Kuje a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Not I for Zakhara. I like Zakhara. The others, eh, I have no opinion.

For some of us, books are as important as almost anything else on earth. What a miracle it is that out of these small, flat, rigid squares of paper unfolds world after world, worlds that sing to you, comfort and quiet and excite you... Books are full of the things that you don't get in real life - wonderful, lyrical language, for instance, right off the bat. - Anne Lamott, Bird by Bird

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium
Go to Top of Page

LucianBarasu
Fellaren-Krae Co-ordinator

USA
214 Posts

Posted - 26 Dec 2006 :  17:32:29  Show Profile  Visit LucianBarasu's Homepage Send LucianBarasu a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Kuje

Not I for Zakhara. I like Zakhara. The others, eh, I have no opinion.

'

I agree. Not Kazhara. I never touched Maztica or the Shou areas nor ever plan on it.




Lucian "The Bringer" Barasu
Fellaren Krae Project Co-Ordinator

"Why do you cry?"
"He is Conan, Cimmerian. He won't cry... So I cry for him."
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36890 Posts

Posted - 26 Dec 2006 :  17:48:00  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by RodOdom


I personally would like to see Wizards "retcon" Matzica, Zakhara and Shou Lung, and replace them with what Ed had originally intended for the realms. It really wouldn't affect too many of the previous novels involing these regions (all of which are out of print.) What do you guys think?



Oh no, not at all. Whether I like something or not, whether or not it is in sourcebooks or novels that are out of print, one fact remains: it is published Realmslore. While I'm not the canon Nazi that some are, I do prefer to stick to canon (or at least creative interpretations of it) as much as possible. I do not want to see previously established canon written out of existence without an incredibly good reason. And, not to offend anyone, but just because something wasn't written by Ed doesn't mean it has no value or place in the Realms.

Besides, the unleashing of 3.x upon the Realms contained quite enough retcons for me, thank you.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Mace Hammerhand
Great Reader

Germany
2296 Posts

Posted - 26 Dec 2006 :  18:06:05  Show Profile  Visit Mace Hammerhand's Homepage Send Mace Hammerhand a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

quote:
Originally posted by RodOdom


I personally would like to see Wizards "retcon" Matzica, Zakhara and Shou Lung, and replace them with what Ed had originally intended for the realms. It really wouldn't affect too many of the previous novels involing these regions (all of which are out of print.) What do you guys think?



Oh no, not at all. Whether I like something or not, whether or not it is in sourcebooks or novels that are out of print, one fact remains: it is published Realmslore. While I'm not the canon Nazi that some are, I do prefer to stick to canon (or at least creative interpretations of it) as much as possible. I do not want to see previously established canon written out of existence without an incredibly good reason. And, not to offend anyone, but just because something wasn't written by Ed doesn't mean it has no value or place in the Realms.

Besides, the unleashing of 3.x upon the Realms contained quite enough retcons for me, thank you.




Hear Hear!

Mace's not so gentle gamer's journal My rants were harmless compared to this, beware!
Go to Top of Page

Faraer
Great Reader

3308 Posts

Posted - 26 Dec 2006 :  19:32:52  Show Profile  Visit Faraer's Homepage Send Faraer a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Luckily, these outlying regions only marginally affect Realmsplay in the core setting. Artistically crass and irresponsible though most of those changes were (certainly including Zakhara, even if you like it in isolation), it's not worth 'officially' undoing them. But -- and this is another task for Ed among too many -- it would be great to see semi-detailed write-ups for these original fabled lands, preferably somewhere relatively prominent such as Dragon.
Go to Top of Page

RodOdom
Senior Scribe

USA
509 Posts

Posted - 26 Dec 2006 :  20:38:17  Show Profile  Visit RodOdom's Homepage Send RodOdom a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Put it this way: with each new iteration of D&D I get more reluctant to buy yet another source book about the same regions, often-times with even less information than the last edition. We can certainly count on 4th or even 5th editions for the Underdark. Perhaps that's why Wizards is trying to come out with new formats mixing sourcebook and module. Unfortunately that doesn't seem to excite most folks.

New, traditional sourcebooks about new continents, realms, closer to what Ed envisioned would certainly get me to open my wallet (threadbare as contents of said wallet usually are.) Such products would be a valuable addition to my Realms collection.

Go to Top of Page

Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
Great Reader

USA
7106 Posts

Posted - 26 Dec 2006 :  22:35:12  Show Profile  Visit Rinonalyrna Fathomlin's Homepage Send Rinonalyrna Fathomlin a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I'm kind of ambivalent about this. I usually prefer to defer to Ed's ideas, and any fantasy setting he comes up with is likely to be more interesting to me than a veritable xerox of a real-world culture...but at the same time, the only "shouldn't be there" location that really bothers me is Maztica. Maztica is just so "Early American History 101" that it annoys the heck out of me.

"Instead of asking why we sleep, it might make sense to ask why we wake. Perchance we live to dream. From that perspective, the sea of troubles we navigate in the workaday world might be the price we pay for admission to another night in the world of dreams."
--Richard Greene (letter to Time)

Edited by - Rinonalyrna Fathomlin on 26 Dec 2006 22:37:27
Go to Top of Page

The Sage
Procrastinator Most High

Australia
31799 Posts

Posted - 27 Dec 2006 :  00:01:50  Show Profile Send The Sage a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by RodOdom

Ed had a "western" continent, but not Maztica.
And don't forget Anchrome. Which I preferred...

quote:
Ed's Moonshae Isles were a cluster of many small Hebrides-style islands.
Ed discussed a little about his original LeGuin-styled islands here:- http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Castle/2566/jg-moonshaes.htm

quote:
Ed had mysterious southern lands, but not Zakhara.
That's exactly how the southern lands remain in my FR... mysterious and alien.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)

"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood

Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage

Edited by - The Sage on 27 Dec 2006 00:02:26
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36890 Posts

Posted - 27 Dec 2006 :  01:04:45  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by RodOdom

New, traditional sourcebooks about new continents, realms, closer to what Ed envisioned would certainly get me to open my wallet (threadbare as contents of said wallet usually are.) Such products would be a valuable addition to my Realms collection.





While I would like to see some of what Ed originally intended, the fact remains that the Realms has since gone in a different direction. Rather than see existing Realmslore invalidated, I'd rather see his original stuff either spun off slightly (maybe by moving it over to one of the undescribed continents) or used in an entirely different setting.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Lemernis
Senior Scribe

378 Posts

Posted - 27 Dec 2006 :  03:00:39  Show Profile  Visit Lemernis's Homepage Send Lemernis a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I'm not real keen on how transparently derivative these other places are from real world history.

For example with Mulhorand isn't it canon that its progenitors actually portaled from earth's ancient Egypt? That's probably the most glaring example.

The real world sources are almost as transparent in Zakhara, Maztica, Chult, and Calimshan. Kara-Tur and Moonshaes too, to a great extent.

While the real world inspirations for those places are pretty neat in their own right, in some ways I would have preferred to see something truly original.

I will say though, that one of the appealing things about the Forgotten Realms is how much input there has been from a collection of writers. I think that makes the Forgotten Realms a more dynamic setting than if it had sprung exclusively from Ed's brain, and no other source. And I agree with Wooly that those non-Faerunian lands are established now, for better or worse. And I agree with some observations THO has made that although derivative each has been given a distinctly 'Realmsian' flavor. Plus DMs can add their own personal touches to give those lands unique quirks.

Edited by - Lemernis on 27 Dec 2006 03:02:21
Go to Top of Page

MerrikCale
Senior Scribe

USA
947 Posts

Posted - 27 Dec 2006 :  03:06:56  Show Profile  Visit MerrikCale's Homepage Send MerrikCale a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I for one wish they would bring back Kara-Tur and Zakhara. Maztica was a dud to me.



When hinges creak in doorless chambers and strange and frightening sounds echo through the halls, whenever candlelights flicker where the air is deathly still, that is the time when ghosts are present, practicing their terror with ghoulish delight.
Go to Top of Page

Jorkens
Great Reader

Norway
2950 Posts

Posted - 27 Dec 2006 :  11:54:44  Show Profile Send Jorkens a Private Message  Reply with Quote
As much as I like Zakhara I would like to hear Eds version of these lands. I don't believe a retcon of the three continents is practically possible and even less for the changed areas of Faerun. The idea would annoy at least as many people as it would appeal to.

That being said, I would chuck out Maztica and Kara-Tur for Eds version of these realms at the first possible moment.
Go to Top of Page

ShadowJack
Senior Scribe

USA
350 Posts

Posted - 27 Dec 2006 :  14:00:44  Show Profile  Visit ShadowJack's Homepage Send ShadowJack a Private Message  Reply with Quote
While I would find Ed's original ideas very interesting, I have to totally agree with Wooly. I have never ran a campaign in Zakhara, Shou Lung or Maztica I still like the idea that they are there. I am different than most people on this topic. I find these Realms-ified views of cultures in our world very interesting and fun. It allows me to add flavor to these areas by copying the cultures they were loosely patterned after. This does not mean that I would bring all elements of a culture into my Realms, just use the anthropolgy/culture as flavor. I also love the idea of playing new exotic characters from far-off lands such as a Jaguar knight from Maztica, a Kensai from Wa or a Sha'ir from the City of Delights... As Wooly said I do not want to see the Realms ret-conned (again)even though there are elements I do not like. Just my thoughts, I could be wrong!

ShadowJack
Go to Top of Page

Korginard
Learned Scribe

USA
126 Posts

Posted - 27 Dec 2006 :  16:00:01  Show Profile  Visit Korginard's Homepage Send Korginard a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Essentially it's up to each DM what does and does not exist in THIER version of the Realms. It would be nice to hear from Ed on what he intended and uses as a DM in his game simply to offer options. That's all they would be, options.
Each DM is a master of thier own Realms. Maztica was never discovered and never will be (Who wants to sail that far anyway!)Kara-Tur was an ugly place and we're all lucky it fell off the edge of the world. Zakhara doesn't exist, instead it is a happy-fun-time land where rainbow bunnies frolic in the purple grass.
Options, that's all they are. I just happen to prefer Zakhara over the rainbow bunnies.



Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2025 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000